Went to renew my one year retirement visa today this would have been my sixth renewal. I entered 7 years ago on with an OA visa from the Thai embassy London. Last year renewed with out issues however today was refused due to not having insurance. My argument was that my OA visa was replaced by extension of stay based on retirement. Apparently not was told itโs still an OA visa thinking this was just the interpretation of that office went to another in the same district, got the same rejection. Was told I would have to leave the country without re-entry permit return on a 30 day then extend before applying for a new visa that is Not OA might just add I was not on my own 7 others had the same problem I have a month before I would need to leave so any information would be appreciated.
Regards
4,586
views
13
likes
129
all likes
45
replies
0
images
18
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
The user is facing an issue with the renewal of their one-year retirement visa in Thailand, which was denied due to the lack of mandatory insurance. Despite having renewed this visa successfully in the past, recent changes in regulations require insurance coverage, which led to the denial. They were informed they need to leave the country and return on a 30-day visa before applying for a different visa that does not require insurance. Many commenters contributed by sharing information on new insurance requirements, alternative visa options, and technicalities related to the retirement extension process.
NON-O RETIREMENT VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES
Go to the Retirement Visa Section for information on requirements, including age restrictions, financial requirements, and necessary documentation.
For immediate assistance, contact Thai Visa Centre directly via LINE at @ThaiVisaCentre or Email them.
Explore recent discussions by using the Non-O Retirement Visa tag in the search box at the top of the page.
the change is with the insurance providers who went to the 3mill policy to make sure you're covered when the change takes effect. That's why they stopped the
there is NO change to the police order INSIDE the country as far as extensions of stays on O-A visas
It's still 800K baht banked, 65K baht a month in income from abroad OR a combination of the two AND you still need the 40K/400K out/in-patient mandatory health insurance from one of the 18 approved thai carriers.
Reply to
Tod *********
Reply
Ken ******
the mandatory health insurance for OA visa was first implemented nov 2019, so.it is quite strange visa renewal possible without immigration asked for it, anyway that saves a lot.of costly insurance premium for a few years for you!
1. We respect Thailand and their rules. I already muted one member for complaining about the rules.
2. For this extension of stay from the Non-OA visa, insurance is a requirement.
3. The insurance requirements for a One Year Extension Of Stay Based On Retirement from a Non-OA visa is not increasing.
Oliver ********
Absolutely, not everyone likes all the rules, but they must be followed or the consequences can be dealt with. This is the way it is and it will stay that way
they are effective October 1, 2022. That is what one member replied correctly as a matter of information.
Reply to
James ********
Reply
Bill ********
I have been informed by my insurance company that as of October 2022 insurance must have a minimum cover of 3.3 million baht up from a minimum of 400k. An 8 fold increase. The insurance company informed me that my premium as a 70 year old will triple in price. This is only a requirement for the O-A extension of stay. As the OP was told by immigration. Leave the country without re-entry permit and return on a 30 day then extend before applying for a new visa that is Not O-A. O extension of stay requires no insurance at present so best to go for that. 800k baht or 65k/month is still required as per O-A.
only need for 30 days on an exempt entry, which can be gotten for less than the price of a 1900 baht extension
Bobby ********
Wannikea Wanblee. But if someone is simply going through the exercise just to avoid the insurance, surely it would be better just to get the 7700 baht useless insurance (but which is ok for OA), rather than flying out, applying for TP, getting one month's insurance, flying back in, and paying for one night SHA+. To me, there's no comparison. If someone is actually leaving the country for other reasons, it's worth looking at, but just to avoid buying health insurance it seems extreme
just trying to help with the pros and cons as no one had mentioned travel insurance needed to get back.
Reply to
Peter ********
Reply
Tod *********
The only way to get around the mandatory insurance requirement for O-A extensions would be to leave the country, come back in on a visa exempt or a 60 day tourist visa, then apply in country first for a 90 day Non-O visa <- (note there is no A after the O meaning you don't need insurance) and after you get that apply for the year extension.
It's tough to bounce out and back in now though with countries shutting back down though
sounds very interesting for me too, this option al least for my upcoming trip (31.12. - 29.04.2022). what are the requirements for a 90 day Non-O (90day) applied for in the county?????
you need to head on over to your immigration office and find out IF they do it and then get the hand out listing the requirements and how many days you need left on your visa exempt or tourist visa entry stamp to apply.
Reply to
Tod *********
Reply
Bobby ********
Depending on your age there is a cheap insurance you can get which is pretty close to useless but it ticks the OA box. You can get it for 7700 baht, which is still cheaper than leaving/coming back which still requires a more expensive insurance and all the associated carry-on. Unless you're planning on a trip away just buy this one
it depends on many things. I'm not on an OA so insurance not required but I still have it. I don't think it's that expensive. I'm 64 and ,เธฟ1M is only around เธฟ45k per annum
Reply to
John **********
Reply
Tod *********
I will just cut and paste the messages I sent you as you didn't see them ๐ฎ
The immigration office was 100% correct, you were always able to trace the stamps back to your original entry on an O-A visa so you fall under the requirements to get an extension based on having an O-A visa <- meaning you DID need to be covered on the
******
out/in-patient health insurance policy by one of the 18 approved thai carriers that sell O-A insurance
how you got a yearly extension from an O-A entry (no matter how long ago it was) at an immigration office last year without having the mandatory insurance is beyond me.
Hi Todd, I went to the LMG website last week and filled in the application form for the 400,
******
,000,. 200,000 deductible "tick the box " policy , which was 6000 for my age group. Next day got an email from them saying they were not doing this policy anymore due to the new requirement for 3million coverage.
Their policies now cover 3.5 million baht with deductible from 300,000 to 1 million.
The new policy with a 1 million deductible for my age group now cost 14,500
that's because by the time you get another extension you will be on the new insurance requirements and they won't cancel a policy once it's issued or let you upgrade. I knew it was a matter of time until they stopped selling the
******
K baht "throw away" 200K deductible insurance
Bobby ********
Dirk Twomey. The 3 million coverage is for visa applications only at this stage. Extensions still have the
******
requirement which will remain until September 2022.
it's not available for renewals...... that's what I'm trying to tell you.......I just applied on their website and got and email next day telling me they are not selling that policy anymore.....
Reply to
Phuket ******
Reply
Thai Visa Advice
... members ยท 40% approval rate
The Thai Visa Advice group is a specialized Q&A forum for visa-related topics in Thailand, ensuring detailed responses.